Short Communication

Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling

Román Romero Ortuño^1,2, Eoin Duggan^1,2

1. FRAILMatics research group, Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
2. Falls and Syncope Unit, Mercer’s Institute for Successful Ageing, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

---

Keywords: EFalls clinic, Physical frailty phenotype, Sarcopenia, Structural equation modeling, Validation studies

---

Abstract

In 1998, Fried and Walston introduced the Cycle of Frailty (CF) as a foundational concept for defining the physical frailty phenotype (FP). While the FP has been extensively validated, the CF hypothesis lacks equivalent support. This study aimed to internally validate the CF using structural equation modeling (SEM) in a clinical dataset of adults aged 50 or older attending an outpatient falls clinic. Measures included: age, morbidity, nutrition, sarcopenia by bioelectrical impedance, VO₂max, handgrip strength, basal metabolic rate (BMR), 5-times chair stand test (5CST), physical activity, and total energy expenditure (TEE). The SEM, incorporating CF hypothesized causal pathways, was tested using IBM^® SPSS^® Amos 27.0.0 (maximum likelihood method) with a sample of 102 adults (mean age 69.8 years, 58.8% women). Overall, the SEM was supported by the data (χ² = 44.4, df = 37, p = 0.189), with significant (p < 0.05) regression weights for morbidity→sarcopenia, age→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→VO₂max, sarcopenia→handgrip strength, handgrip strength→5CST, physical activity→TEE, TEE→nutrition, and BMR→TEE. However, nutrition→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→BMR, VO₂max→5CST, and 5CST→physical activity were not significant. Although the SEM was limited by inclusion of surrogate CF measures (e.g., 5CST instead of gait speed, VO₂max based on age-predicted maximal/resting heart rate), it provided some internal support for the CF hypothesis.

---

Share this article on:

Twitter  LinkedIn  Facebook